Dance in the Dark

1 Comment »

Walk toward the sound of my voice. This was Dana Salisbury’s instruction to us, a group of about 20 people who were standing, blindfolded, in a hallway outside a dance studio on a recent Saturday night. We were there for a performance of Salisbury’s Unseen Dance, and part of the deal was that we weren’t allowed to see the space in which the dance would take place. Our only cues about our surroundings would come from sound, touch and smell.

But first we had to grope our way down the hall, tentatively shuffling forward, until a hand reached out to guide us into the space. Those first few minutes in the dark felt like tumbling down the rabbit hole. I could have sworn that the hallway was getting narrower as I moved, and it was a great relief when someone took my arm and ushered me into the studio.

When I interviewed Salisbury last summer, she told me that wearing the blindfold created a heightened state of sensory awareness — I think she called it a calm alertness. It was an accurate description. My initial anxiety quickly melted away, and my entire body was suddenly awake.

My skin tingled as a dancer rushed past, leaving a cool breeze in (his? her?) wake; my heartbeat quickened as more dancers joined in, running back and forth and breathing hard. They sounded terrified, as though someone or something were chasing them. A low growl erupted several feet away, and soon it was right next to my ear. There was a bee-like buzzing that sounded echoey, like when you speak through a paper towel tube. Something soft and feathery brushed across the tops of my feet. What would happen next?

We sat in metal folding chairs for part of the performance, and at other times we were instructed to stand. At one point, Salisbury told us to walk forward and take some food. I hardly had time to think about how I was going to accomplish that before I was swept up in a crush of bodies and felt a firm grip on my arm. My hand was plunged into a box filled with sandwich baggies; I came up with a fistful and found crackers inside.

During the performance I found myself thinking about a Halloween many years ago, when a particularly crafty neighborhood mom transformed her basement into a haunted house. Disembodied voices and creepy noises greeted us as we descended into the pitch-dark, and we were instructed to touch a series of squishy items identified as brains, guts and other internal organs. It was scary but also sort of magical, this idea that an ordinary basement could be so altered simply by flipping the light switch and forcing us to use our other senses.

I don’t mean to equate Unseen Dance with a homemade haunted house, though it did have its share of disturbing moments. There were also moments of beauty, some surprisingly emotional, as when a dancer took my hand and placed it on her diaphragm so that I could feel its staccato rise and fall as she laughed. A woman sang in a clear, sweet voice, and at one point my nose was filled with the scent of oranges. Unlike my haunted house experience, when I was relieved to have the lights turned back on, I was reluctant to take off my blindfold at the end of Salisbury’s performance.

As a critic, I have spent a great deal of time sharpening my visual observation skills. After Unseen Dance, it became clear that I need some practice tuning in to my other senses — as it turned out, I missed quite a few things. When I spoke to Salisbury after the performance, she asked if I’d noticed a moment when the pressure seemed to drop. I hadn’t. But apparently, someone had placed a bucket over my head at some point in the performance and I was completely oblivious to it. Also, I’d somehow failed to detect the aroma of cooked steak.

In relying on sight we tend to forget about our bodies, and in the process we shut out lots of important information. When I described the performance to a friend, he remarked that it didn’t sound like dance to him. But dance is nothing without the body, and while most dances focus attention only on the performers’ bodies, Salisbury forces audience members to pay attention to their own as well. With Unseen Dance, she’s cracked open a whole new world of possibilities for experiencing dance. And I’m looking forward to following her, blindly, wherever she goes next.

  • Share/Bookmark

Hot Off the Press: Elizabeth Streb

Add Comment »


A couple of months ago I had the pleasure of interviewing Elizabeth Streb, aka the Evel Knievel of Dance, at the Streb Lab for Action Mechanics (SLAM) in Brooklyn. Streb, who prefers the title “action architect” to choreographer, tests the limits of human movement with neat-o gadgets like the Whizzing Gizmo shown here in the video.

If you haven’t seen Streb’s company in action, get yourself over to Williamsburg and check them out — you can find their rehearsal schedule here. If you’re not in New York, catch them on tour.

In the meantime, please click here to read my interview with Streb in the current issue of Dance Teacher magazine.

  • Share/Bookmark

Discussing the Unseeable

Add Comment »

Still/Here by Bill T. Jones

This month marks 15 years since former New Yorker dance critic Arlene Croce scandalized the arts world by writing a scathing review of Bill T. Jones’ “Still/Here” without actually having seen it. Croce dismissed the piece, which featured terminally ill people talking about their illnesses, as victim art and refused to see it on the grounds that Jones had crossed a line between performance and reality, thereby making it “undiscussable” as a work of art. In short, she said, she could not review people she was forced to feel sorry for.

Coincidentally, on the occasion of this ignominious anniversary I, too, have found myself with an opportunity to review a dance work without seeing it. Unlike Croce, I have no ideological objections to this piece. Also unlike Croce, I plan to attend the performance. The reason I won’t see it is that I will, like the rest of the audience, be wearing a blindfold while the dance takes place.

Dana Salisbury

The piece is Dana Salisbury’s Unseen Dance, and it’s happening Saturday night at Green Space in Long Island City. I interviewed Salisbury a few months ago for an article that appeared in The Brooklyn Rail, and we spent a rainy afternoon talking about how she came up with the idea to create dances for audiences who can’t see them. As it turns out, the idea evolved from a project she created called Dark Dining, in which participants experience a four-course meal and entertainment–musicians, singers, tap dancers, beat boxers–while blindfolded.

I’m excited about finally getting to experience Salisbury’s strange sensory world for myself on Saturday night. I also have to admit that the prospect of literally putting myself in the hands of a bunch of strangers who I’ll never actually lay eyes on (Salisbury calls her dancers the No-See-Ums) is kind of scary. Tune in for my report next week.

  • Share/Bookmark

A New Experiment for Cherylyn Lavagnino Dance

1 Comment »

A confession: I have a fear of post-performance Q&A sessions. While they can sometimes offer surprising insights about a given piece or choreographer’s process, they also have the potential to devolve into drawn-out torture sessions of discomfort. Either everyone is too shy to ask a question (guilty), or someone in the audience is all too eager to display his or her dance knowledge with a long, rambling dissertation about something that has nothing to do with the subject at hand.

Happily, there are exceptions–and Sunday afternoon’s salon series performance of Cherylyn Lavagnino Dance at NYU’s Tisch Dance Studio was one of them. There, a very young audience member’s comments renewed my faith in the value of Q&A sessions and left me with a deeper appreciation for the work of Lavagnino, a choreographer who blends classical ballet and contemporary dance.

On the program were four pieces, including a work-in-progress called Menage, which Lavagnino and her company created during a residency at The Silo this past summer. According to Lavagnino, the inspiration for the piece came from Degas’ ballerina sculptures, and indeed watching the dance was like seeing those sculptures come to life. Dancers coupled and un-coupled in a series of intricate partner work that is one of the hallmarks of Lavagnino’s style. The movements were deliberate and meditative, as though the dancers were figuring out in that moment how they might fit together and how their movements–the sweep of a leg or the nudge of an elbow–would cause the other to respond.

Little hints of narrative flickered throughout. In one, a woman clung passionately to a man who appeared not to notice her. In another, two men joyfully waltzed each other across the floor, coming to rest side by side with linked arms.

The program moved along swiftly, and by the time the last piece was over it took me a moment to bring Menage back to mind. But a young boy, who couldn’t have been more than seven or eight, was ready with an astute observation. He noticed that there were lots of different stories in the dance, he said, but not one whole story. He was right on, and Lavagnino told him so. The piece lacked an overall cohesiveness because it was still stuck on the fence between abstract and narrative.

Thanks to the boy’s thoughtful observation, we learned from Lavagnino that narrative work is new territory for her. She added that she plans to bring in Kay Cummings, who teaches acting for dance at NYU, where Lavagnino is dance department chair, to help flesh out the story and the dancers’ characters. And though the dance was sparked by Degas, both Lavagnino and composer Scott Killian admitted that it seems to be taking on a kind of deep-South, Tennessee Williams flavor as they continue to work on both the dance and the music (composed by Killian in collaboration with Jacob Lawson and Jane Chung).

And so, as the boy so precociously suggested, the whole story has yet to emerge.

It will be interesting to see how it all turns out. We’ll have our chance in the spring, when Cherylyn Lavagnino Dance has a season at Symphony Space May 6-8.

In the meantime, the kid in the audience has given me a lot to think about–not just in terms of Lavagnino’s piece but in how I approach my work as a dance critic. Like the know-it-all who hijacks a post-performance Q&A session to expound on obscure bits of dance ephemera, dance critics can fall into the same trap in our writing. In our valiant attempts to grasp at a piece’s meaning and relevance we can often lose sight of what’s happening right in front of us. The boy reminded me that the first thing you have to do is take a deep breath and tell what you saw, and say it simply. The rest will unfold from there.

  • Share/Bookmark